Disclosure is the norm of the crypto world. Thank you for the information released this time. I wish the ecology will get better and better, but is this linear and continuous release of funds benign? I personally prefer to create an independent distribution mechanism or section for contributors:
An independent series of NFTs maintains returns and relationships through the market value of the series of NFTs.
The market value of funds is the income guarantee for contributors. Whether it is sold or not is affected by NFT and has nothing to do with rbw, which is also conducive to the maintenance of interests.
Independent points or distribution mechanisms are given to contributors.
In a word, openness is the norm, and you can divide the scene to see if it is worthwhile or empowering.
We ae at the beginning, And this look like our best start but we can add more detail in it.
Like Terminus is a protocal by āMoonStrean Teamā because so manny ppl here is gonna be newbie in Crypto world At least give them a name that They can DYOR easier.
Btw This is my 1st GOV that really join in hope gp stronger together TEAM!!!
This is a brilliant Grants example and we will support and vote for this proposal. This proposal will lay a foundation for much more collaboration in the future with potential partners.
I want to thank our current partners, Moonstream DAO, Venture Counsel, Emfarsis and CarsonMBrown, who have helped and continue to help us immensely.
The invested RBW amount seems like a fair one as this is one of the foundational investment which are usually costly for starting project.
As an investor, voter and a member, it would also be appreciated if we could quantify the benefits of the invested RBW (when applicable). It is not a requirement for me but it would be great to have if we could.
