So if I understand correctly. Please correct me if wrong. We paid the Initial Cost: 8 eth or 20k USDC whichever is smaller USD value at the time
yes
And the stated reasons for the change is based on play testing with community.
Reason is this will give us the best chance for success. Something appealing and has a deeper economy than just “play games and get raked”. We’ve already seen how that goes with every other game.
But I feel its likely easier to not make things twice
Agree with you, Nowan has joined the project and I don’t see another proposal months down the road just for art being successful.
It is sad to see that conversation has derailed so much from the purpose of this thread and the “competition” (to call it nice) from serious has moved in here.
We are obviously not judging a game here anymore, but using this opportunity to settle scores and old grudges.
We got used to tease each other on serious, but for some competition turned into hate and a crusade to hurt the others, regardless of truth, reason, logic or common sense.
And the biggest problem is that we are starting to consider this behaviours normal and we seen them displayed even here, on this public forum, where we decide our future with CU.
Don’t forget, if CU wins we all win, if it fails we fail altogether.
It is obvious that we are not having an objective and reasonable debate in this thread.
That includes me, I might be biased because I teamed up with Dip in game on several occasions.
Moving forward, I strongly believe that LG has to get involved and make a decision in this case.
In the end, this is their area of expertise: Game Developing.
LG has to decide if the costs, game mechanics and timeline are reasonable and vote accordingly.
Peace!
3 Likes
Hello, everyone!
The author has made a request to retract this proposal.
Because of this, as per request of the author, this proposal thread will now be closed.
Thank you for participating in the discussion.
1 Like