Thanks for all your answers thus far.
I support other builders building games. I love Nowan’s art. It looks great.
My concern is regarding the changes to Time and Cost and to the scope changes from your first proposal.
The scope has changed a lot. You’ve outlined the changes well. But why not just go with your first proposal’s plans/projections and scope and then iterate if the live game is well liked? Another proposal could be added at that point to continue to build it out.
1st proposal for reference: Unicorn Gladiators
**Timeframe and cost comparison between the 2 proposals : **
Original Proposal-
Timeframe: Web3 integration and full launch 4-8 weeks after 2nd proposal passes
Total Cost: 1 time payment 25 eth or 60k USDC whichever is smaller USD value at the time
New Proposal-
Timeframe: To be live tentatively towards the end of Q3
Total Cost: 130,000 USDC
Additionally, when the playtest went live, maybe I just missed it, but why no posting in general and/or serious to try to get players to test it out for feedback?
Also, have you looked into applying for grants from XAI and/or ARB as well? That could be another source of funds to help with the continued build out if the game is well liked.
Fyi… game feedback-wise, I did try the game. Granted, maybe it’s not my game type, or I just didn’t understand how to play it, but it felt slow. I got bored quickly and didn’t try it again.
Thanks Dip. Just my initial thoughts.