This is the official governance process.
A draft proposal that has stayed open for atleast 5 days is for review on the next scheduled council review. Council reviews are held every 15th and the 30th.
This draft proposal has been live for 5 days on the day of the scheduled council review. Based on the votes during the review, the council has decided to pass the proposal for a Snapshot vote.
Thanks MerkleTree but I don’t see the spirit of web3 in your proposal. It looks like you would be the only one benefiting from this marketplace while the community has no real incentive to vote yes (for now).
Of course we need to get our own secure marketplace with a custom UX but we want to get a better deal, and spend the ecosystem fund carefully.
If you would consider to change your proposal for a fix fee of 1% I would probably give you my yes (1M sRBW):
| Monthly Gross Volume USDC | Percentage Fee | Community fee |
|---|---|---|
| $0.00 → $5,000,000.00 | 0.5% | 0.5% |
| $5,000,000.01 → $25,000,000.00 | 0.25% | 0.75% |
| $25,000,000.01+ | 0.125% | 0.875% |
It could allow to replenish the ecosystem fund, get back what we gave you over time and continue developing the ecosystem in a sustainable way. It could be used for tournament prizes or to buy back and burn some UNIM. It could be use in many way, but I think to continue to grow the community need to take a fee on the marketplace.
Hello. Thanks for the feedback. The proposal is now locked so we can’t consider any changes. I think, @lgManicUnicorn please correct me if I am incorrect, that anyone could propose “Add a community fee” to the marketplace in a subsequent proposal. I think it could be a good positive for the community if implemented.
That’s right. The proposal may not be edited while Snapshot is live. The council review approval it received was for the content of its current iteration and those who already voted were voting for its current iteration.
To answer the other question, if any proposal gets approved, addendums can be made by writing a new proposal to support an approved CUIP. This will still need to go through the governance process outlined here.
I’d like to inform the community of something that was recently discussed within the council but not in this thread.
As Merkle Root indicated in this proposal, the marketplce will support all CU NFT assets - all present and future NFT assets. This will come at no extra cost and will be part of maintenance work.
During the voting there is a so-called silence time…
No party can campaign during this period of time…
It is strange to see from a team member that writes some additional information…
I have a lot of respect for you Maniс 
, but, let’s refrain from additional information.
Hi Winter! Sorry if you’re misunderstanding something. Discussions are expected to continue during the voting period. However, we are not allowed to edit the proposal while it is on Snapshot.
We highly encourage the continued discussion. This will ensure that the author will know what they’re missing for if and when the proposal fails. As LG’s Governance Facilitator, it is my job to facilitate, ensuring that the DAO has all the information it needs to make an informed decision and that things are moving forward. The governance process is found here for your reference.
Sorry then, I have no guarantee there will be a subsequent proposal so it is a no for me.
I hope you will review your proposal, improve it with the feedbacks and resubmit it later.
From my point of view it lacked 3 main things:
Communication: A slide deck where you present the team and the proposal in a visual way
Transparency: Detailed sheet to explain the cost + clarity about the ownership of the marketplace IP ( Laguna Games | Merkle Root | the DAO ? )
Web 3 spirit & sustainability: Give back to the community (ex: fee to replenish the ecosystem-fund & community-treasury over time)
In such a market for such a price, doing this is a luxury!
The snapshot just closed with a no vote.
Thanks everyone for considering our proposal. We have had a great time interacting with everyone and having some fun/interesting conversations.
UwU 
Snapshot voting period has ended.
https://bit.ly/3JiM1R3
For: 13,599,918.19
Against: 32,995,391.63
Total Votes: 46,595,309.82
% Participation: 45.38%
Based on the result, we shall not be implementing the proposal at this time.
Thank you very much @sonolumin, for writing the proposal and for consistently interfacing with the community, and thank you to everyone who contributed in the discussion.
