I disagree. This proposal doesn’t need to outline anything more than reduced emissions. Once that agreed upon, future proposals should be used for suggestions on what to do with the extra RBW we have sitting in the staking contract.
By trying to talk about the next step, we will hold up the critical piece of slowing emissions. Also, that’s something that can be easily agreed or disagreed upon. Talking about what to do with the RBW could lead to dozens of options and dozens of community debates.
Nothing will happen with the RBW until the community decides. We don’t have to rush that piece.